Back to
Broadband Opportunities -
Fiber
Technologies
Three
Fundamental Architectures for FTTH
Essentially, there are
three fundamental architectures for delivering fiber directly to a
subscriber’s house: point-to-point, switched, and Passive Optical
Network (PON). All three FTTH architectures require an aggregation
device in the CO (the Optical Line Terminal or OLT), and all three
require an optical to electrical converter (Optical Network Terminal or
ONT) in or on the house. These three architectures differ mainly in what
type of device (if any) is installed between the CO and the house.
One common characteristic
of the FTTH network architectures is the use of bidirectional
transceivers (BIDI) allowing the use of a single fiber to serve each
home. One wavelength is used for downstream (Central Office to Home),
and another wavelength is used for upstream transmissions (Home to
Central Office). Bidirectional transmission on a single fiber increases
the cost of optical transceivers somewhat, but it reduces the quantity
of fiber (and labor to splice the fiber) needed to serve a home by half.
Point-to-Point or Active Fiber Network
Point-to-Point (P2P, also
known as Active Fiber) is the simplest of all three FTTH fundamental
architectures. With a P2P network architecture, a fiber (typically only
a single fiber) is installed from each subscriber’s house directly into
the Central Office serving that subscriber. This architecture has the
advantage of simplicity, but it does require terminating lots of fiber
cables in the Central Office (CO).

The CO contains a high
port count aggregation device (one port per subscriber) known as an
Optical Line Terminal or OLT. An Optical Network Terminal (ONT) is
installed either on the side of the subscriber’s house (typical in the
US) or inside the subscriber’s house (not typical in the US). P2P has an
advantage that no port is shared in any way, thus troubleshooting
problems on the network is greatly simplified. With P2P, problems can
be easily isolated. Additionally, this architecture has the highest
bandwidth potential. Links are easily upgraded to higher rates
(requires new optics and electronics on both ends however), and each
additional fiber linearly adds more aggregate bandwidth to the network.
Active Fiber has an
advantage in that no port is shared in any way, thus troubleshooting
problems on the network is greatly simplified. With this simple
architecture, optical problems can be easily isolated. Additionally,
this architecture has the highest bandwidth potential. Links are easily
upgraded to higher rates (requires new optics and electronics on both
ends however), and each additional fiber linearly adds more aggregate
bandwidth to the network.
Switched
or Active Ethernet Network
A switched FTTH
architecture (commonly Active Ethernet) has many of the advantages of
P2P, but it dramatically reduces the number of fibers terminated in the
CO. Of the three architectures, it has the potential to have the fewest
fiber terminations in the CO, but it requires the largest investment in
the OutSide Plant (OSP). To aggregate fibers delivered directly to
subscribers, a switched architecture requires switches be installed in
secured cabinets between the CO and the subscriber homes.

Passive
Optical Network
A Passive Optical Network
or PON network architecture is similar to the switched architecture, but
it requires no OSP electronics. Instead, an optical splitter is used in
place of the OSP switch. The splitter divides the light coming from the
OLT, and it combines the light coming from the ONTs. This greatly
reduces the cost of OSP aggregation since the splitter is inexpensive,
requires no power and very little, if any maintenance.

Maximum concentration of
subscribers is generally limited to 32 per fiber (with a 32 port
splitter) delivered to the CO, though up to 64x and even 128x splits are
possible. BPON, EPON, and GPON are common types of PON networks in use
today. 10G EPON and 10G GPON are new technologies to be deployed in the
next few years. WDM PON is similar, but instead of a splitter, it
requires an Arrayed WaveGuide (AWG) to divide wavelengths for individual
delivery to subscribers. Note that a PON may support RF overlay analog
video, which is generally not feasible in the other two architectures.
Back to
Broadband Opportunities -
Fiber Technologies
Active and Passive Optical
Networks
Fiber optics uses
light signals to transmit data. As this data
moves across a fiber, there needs to be a way to
separate it so that it gets to the proper
destination.
There are two
important types of systems that make
fiber-to-the-home broadband connections
possible. These are active optical networks and
passive optical networks. Each offers ways to
separate data and route it to the proper place,
and each has advantages and disadvantages as
compared to the other.
An active optical
system uses electrically powered switching
equipment, such as a router or a switch
aggregator, to manage signal distribution and
direct signals to specific customers. This
switch opens and closes in various ways to
direct the incoming and outgoing signals to the
proper place. In such a system, a customer may
have a dedicated fiber running to his or her
house.
A passive optical
network, on the other hand, does not include
electrically powered switching equipment and
instead uses optical splitters to separate and
collect optical signals as they move through the
network. A passive optical network shares fiber
optic strands for portions of the network.
Powered equipment is required only at the source
and receiving ends of the signal.
In some cases, FTTH
systems may combine elements of both passive and
active architectures to form a hybrid system.
Passive Optical
Networks, or PONs, have some distinct
advantages. They're efficient, in that each
fiber optic strand can serve up to 32 users.
PONs have a low building cost relative to active
optical networks along with lower maintenance
costs. Because there are few moving or
electrical parts, there's simply less that can
go wrong in a PON.
Passive Optical
Networks also have some disadvantages. They have
less range than an active optical network,
meaning subscribers must be geographically
closer to the central source of the data. PONs
also make it difficult to isolate a failure when
they occur. Also, because the bandwidth in a PON
is not dedicated to individual subscribers, data
transmission speed may slow down during peak
usage times in an effect known as latency.
Latency quickly degrades services such as audio
and video, which need a smooth rate to maintain
quality.
Active Optical
Networks offer certain advantages, as well.
Their reliance on Ethernet technology makes
interoperability among vendors easy. Subscribers
can select hardware that delivers an appropriate
data transmission rate and scale up as their
needs increase without having to restructure the
network.
Active Optical
Networks, however, also have their weaknesses.
They require at least one switch aggregator for
every 48 subscribers. Because it requires power,
an active optical network inherently is less
reliable than a passive optical network.
Back to
Broadband Opportunities -
Fiber
Technologies